Sojourner-Truth Rejected & almost defeated.

We present information from public domain documents that are almost two hundred years old. This vitally important information is presented in Bold Black Text.

Rejected, confused, and almost defeated, the events of the past few weeks have not been kind to Matthias, Ann, Benjamin, or Sojourner-Truth. Their world has been invaded and nearly destroyed from the pressures of immorality, and the fear of religious confusion. In this moment of dark despair, life must continue; however, circumstances can on times turn from desperation into destruction!        

In the newspapers, we find what I like to call the coffee story. Within the American Advocate, we read the quote. ‘Upon the morning of that day, Matthias partook of, but very little breakfast and secretly tasted the coffee saying as the excuse, that he was unwell. Immediately after breakfast, Mr. Folger, his wife, and the children were taken violently sick. Mr. Folger did not suspect the cause of the sickness until after the villain had left the city; when upon examination, he learned that the black woman (Sojourner-Truth) who had done the cooking for the family, had also abstained from the use of the coffee upon that morning, and from other circumstances, he became confirmed that the woman (Sojourner-Truth) was bribed by Matthias to poison the family.’ (Ref: 254.) Most Americans enjoy a good cup of coffee in the morning, just as most British people enjoy a good cup of tea at any time of the day. So how can a drink of coffee develop into allegations of attempted murder?     

In our previous chapter, you will remember that Matthias, in a fit of rage, stamped his feet and pronounced damnation, and a curse on Ann, the rejected mother of the house. Surprisingly with each passing hour, Ann is growing in confidence as she has not died, nor is she showing any signs of ill health! Turning to the words of Mr. Stone, we find the story continuing to unfold we read, quote. ‘But finding that she outlived one curse, she felt encouraged to urge her husband, when he came home in the evening, to be more prompt in effecting the dismissal of Matthias. And on the following morning, she proposed that he should leave her upstairs and say to Matthias distinctly that he should have no more opportunity of preaching to her and insist upon his leaving that day. This was done, and he (Matthias) promised to go but requested that the family might dine together once more. Mr. Folger took Mrs. Folger’s breakfast up to her room, and she drank freely of the coffee.’ (Ref: C214.)

Turning to Isabella, we find a most interesting twist to this very same event, as we are informed. ‘In the morning, when Catherine left Mr. Folgers’s (Benjamin’s) room, Mrs. Folger went into it and did not come down to breakfast, but Mr. Folger took her up coffee: no regular breakfast was taken that morning. The confusion of the night and the irritated state of the feelings of the party took away the appetite; Matthias scarcely ate anything, Isabella (Sojourner-Truth) very little’ (Ref: H93.)

Within these versions of events, we find two different stories. In statements issued by the Folger encampment, we find Ann in bed in Mr. Folger’s room; and they give no reference to the activities of a few hours previous when Matthias rejected Ann. Additionally, there is also no mention made of Benjamin sleeping with Catherine, nor do we have the information that Ann in the morning entered Benjamin’s bed after Catherine had left it! Undoubtedly the Folger encampment knows how to spin a good yarn, and they are perfect in their ability to promote and protect the Folger position!   

With Ann ensconced in her room, and drinking coffee in bed, events continue to escalate as she wants to talk with her six-year-old daughter. On entering her mother’s bedroom, the child has some important news; she said quote. ‘Mother, Mr. Matthias said, that was not the Lord’s table they ate at this morning, but the devils.’ Continuing with her news she then said. ‘Mr. Matthias did not eat any breakfast,’ after which she informs her mother, who has either finished or is still drinking her coffee, that quote. ‘The coffee was not good, and that she could not drink it.’ Ann ignored the information from her six-year-old daughter and blissfully continues to drink her coffee.

As usual, Benjamin is downstairs, only this time he is attempting to move furniture so that it can be sold at auction, as required by the Pierson relatives via the courts! While descending the stairs, Ann encounters her son, who is about ten years of age, after which he tells her, quote. ‘Mother, the coffee was so bad this morning I could hardly drink it.’ Without giving this matter any consideration, Ann replied quote. ‘Why did you drink it then?’ At this stage in the coffee story, Ann has enjoyed her coffee, while all other members of the house have experienced something strange in the taste of this morning’s drink! (Ref C214.)

THESE FACTS ARE POINT NUMBER 108.

Working together, Ann and Benjamin continue organizing the furniture. In his usual manner, Matthias has moved into the kitchen, where he is preaching, and renewing his threats towards Ann. Attempting to avoid each other, and with this apparent divide between Ann and Matthias continuing to widen, he now views her as an evil creature from the depths of hell. She is currently the enemy from within, and Matthias wants nothing to do with her!    

From our understanding of Sojourner-Truths viewpoint, it is apparent that Ann has also irrevocably changed her opinion of Matthias; it is reported quote. ‘Mrs. Folger appeared again in the family, but with an altered tone. She now called Mr. B. Folger, husband, a term which she formerly used, but which had been dropped since she was called mother, and she especially informed Isabella (Sojourner-Truth) that she wanted Mr. Folger to be obeyed. her tone towards Matthias was altered, and her beautiful soft voice seemed to have acquired a harshness.’ Sojourner-Truth then reiterates the point when she reports quote. ‘Matthias was no longer the favorite, and Mr. Folger was again taken to be her husband, and Matthias’ physical powers even were now depreciated.’ With his earthly and heavenly standing in jeopardy, Matthias and his position as a Prophet seem diminished. Surprisingly the physical powers of Matthias are also questioned by Ann, the mother of this failing house!      

Ann’s position is dramatically changed; she is out of favor with both her husband Benjamin and the so-called ‘father of the house’ Matthias. Her reputation and social standing amongst her peers and friends are in tatters as we see daily reports flooding the newspapers exposing life within the Zion of Matthias.

The good fortune of fate and family breading has dimmed into the darkness of pending bankruptcy, and family turmoil. Attempting to move forward, Ann, like Matthias, appears to have limited options. After only a few hours, Ann decides to make her innermost feelings known: she turns away from Matthias and using her charms, and soft words, positions herself back into Benjamin’s favor! If ever there was a chance for Benjamin to break free from his home and life invasion, then this is it. The only questions are; will Benjamin take it, and if so, will he be successful. With the stakes of family and personal life paramount, Benjamin, quote. ‘Became urgent with Matthias to leave.’ Interestingly the pressure was passive aggression as we read quote. ‘Still there was no direct quarreling, and Matthias did not leave that day.’ (Ref H93.)

Eventually, with the arrival of food and with appetites diminished, the pending bleakness of Matthias’ self-induced situation hits him hard as quote. ‘Matthias did not eat any dinner, but wept while the rest were eating.’ The idea of Matthias crying tears around the table is surprising, as these tears, according to the Folgers, were real tears. (RefC215)

Side note. We have no independent witness confirming this fact; hence the reliability of this information must be called into question, as the idea of Matthias showing a weakness does not conform to his usual method of dealing with stressful situations!

With the meal finished and tables cleared, Ann took the children into her bedroom chamber. Against all the odds, once again, rain renders unfavorable conditions for departure, enabling Matthias to stay for one more night of mayhem and confusion! Hours later, and with supper on the table, attention turns once again towards Matthias and his pending departure. We have no information regarding the feelings of Benjamin, Ann, Catherine, or Isabella, as all the attention becomes focused on Prophet Matthias. Even the children’s futures seem connected with Matthias and his willingness to depart. Sitting at the table Matthias refuses to eat, he is there for a reason, and he wants to talk, and when Matthias speaks, he expects others to listen. True to his character, he verbally attacks his former disciples, blaming them for the current disastrous situation. Stepping forward, once again, Benjamin quote. ‘Forbade his preaching anymore to his family, and he (Matthias) was silenced for the time.’          

Almost broken and defeated, the ironclad rule which Matthias wielded over his disciples has faltered, and the idea of his perfect Zion is a far distant dream! Matthias has lost control; he no longer commands respect apart from perhaps his children, and Sojourner-Truth. Turning to the children, Benjamin quote. ‘Asked him (Matthias) if he should send his sons to their mother in Albany; Matthias replied he would as soon send them to hell, but in the same breath said he wished he would.’ With ever-diminishing opportunities, Matthias attempts to imply that he will take the children and himself to an undisclosed quote. ‘House somewhere in New- York.’ Thinking and acting quickly, possibly disliking the idea of Matthias being a neighbor in the city of New York, Benjamin informs Matthias that he had quote. ‘Promised their mother that if they were to leave his family, he would send them to her.’ Firmly he then told Matthias that he must send the children to Margaret in Albany, as the idea of having Matthias remaining in New York City has never been in the game plan of the Folgers. (Ref C215.)

After a final restless night’s sleep, we have two options to consider. Focusing on the details of these two different plans is vitally important, as the correct information is power.  

The First original plan presented by the Folgers is finding a farm and new home in the west.

A second revised plan presented by Prophet Matthias is finding new accommodation in New York City.                                                                    

Before moving forward in our final series of events we need to reacquaint ourselves with Catherine Galloway as she will play a part in events yet to come. Still mourning the loss of her husband, from the so-called Matthias curse, Catherine Galloway is distressed at the additional loss of Benjamin her matched spirit. In one statement, we read the quote. ‘Catherine was restless, for she had just lost her spouse lately taken from her forever; on that day she had cried and wrung her hands at her loss, till comforted by Mr. B. Folger, who promised to protect her.’ (Ref: H100.) The promise to help Catherine is impressive. One wonders if Benjamin’s feelings, and need to help Catherine, are driven by guilt, and the acknowledgment that the conduct of the Folger family has caused Catherine’s desperate situation.   

Surprisingly Ann and Catherine, during the final hours of their involvement with Matthias, stand united together! In their attempt to move forward, the remaining disciples in the crumbling Zion of Matthias have now divided into two small factions! In the first, we have Benjamin, Ann, Catherine, the Folger children, and surprisingly the two sons of Matthias. In the second, we have Matthias and Isabella Van Wagener, who re-named herself Sojourner-Truth.         

During the final events of the last night together, we find Benjamin out for a few hours on business. Almost as if it was the final act of fate, we are informed that Matthias and Sojourner-Truth move down into the kitchen, as they need to talk. Ann and Catherine also gravitate to the kitchen, at which point they find themselves face to face with Matthias and Sojourner-Truth. As the conversation progresses, Matthias and Sojourner-Truth only wish to talk with the easy-going, slightly vacuous Catherine Galloway! We read quote. ‘Matthias and the colored woman (Sojourner-Truth) began to persuade her (Catherine) to join them in keeping house.’ Arriving home, Benjamin missed the conversation in the kitchen, however, Catherine has made her decision, and she is remaining loyal to Benjamin, her desired match spirit partner. In one vitally important sentence, we find out why Catherine refused to join with Matthias and Sojourner-Truth, we read quote. ‘And they no doubt would have induced Catherine to go with them, but for the advice of Mr. and Mrs. Folger.’ (Ref C216.)

Eventually, each adult retires to their bedroom, where they attempt to sleep, as the following day must surely be the final day for Matthias!

THESE FACTS ARE POINT NUMBER 109.

Awakening the next morning, the divisions in this unhappy household are visually apparent. We have Ann, Benjamin, Catherine, and the Folger children, enjoying breakfast in the parlor. Together downstairs in the kitchen, we find Sojourner-Truth, Matthias, and his children who have apparently switch allegiance!       

Before breakfast commenced, Ann and Catherine had a most unusual conversation while reflecting on the events of the previous twenty-four hours. This information written in hindsight appears to be correct, as both encampments report the same facts in alarming detail, most of which dovetail together exceptionally well, we read quote. ‘Mrs. Folger then remembered the children’s complaint about the coffee, and Matthias not eating when they did. In consequence of this, she told Catherine in the morning to get breakfast separately for us, to be sure they washed everything to be used, and not to use any of the provisions then in the house.’ The words and actions of Ann are alarming and quite damning; she has judged and condemned Matthias and Isabella! There are two factions at play here, there is the spiritual curse metered out by Matthias to Ann, Benjamin, and the rest of the house, but there is also the burgeoning idea that the coffee partaken by some of the household was tampered with and tainted! As the conversation continues in innuendo, speculation, and annoyance, we read that Catherine, quote. ‘Mentioned to Mrs. Folger, that she had observed the coffee was bad the morning before, had a strange taste, and had something white in it.’

Continuing with the story, Catherine then said that she has talked to Sojourner-Truth about the coffee, who replied that quote. ‘She could not expect to have good coffee, or any blessing, while her Father was offended.’ Remaining loyal to Matthias, Sojourner-Truth believes the coffee is bad because of divine spiritual intervention! Using the same words, Sojourner-Truth is seeking to show her belief and faith in Matthias. She is inferring a spiritual response on behalf of Matthias. She states, the withholding of blessings will remain if the Folgers continue their planned course of action, by instructing Matthias to leave his accommodation at eight Third Street, New York. In the additional notes from Isabella, we read that Sojourner-Truth quote. ‘Observed that the curse of God was on that house.’ (Ref H100.)     

Surprisingly, whichever way we look at it  the Folgers in their comments are attempting to portion blame on Sojourner-Truth!

THESE FACTS ARE POINT NUMBER110.

Finishing the conversation, Ann remains within her bedroom, while Catherine sets about preparing breakfast as instructed. After breakfast, Benjamin tells Matthias that quote. ‘He must be off immediately, that he (Benjamin) should not leave the house until he had gone, that as for his sons, they should be sent to their mother.’ (Ref: C217.) Working towards his perceived objective, Benjamin is in full control, as he wants no further delay, Matthias must depart, and it must be today as it has stopped raining, we presume! In the closing hours of their time together at eight Thirst Street, a most remarkable conversation occurs between Matthias and Benjamin. The communication is about money, and Benjamin is prepared to give a lot of it to Matthias: we read, quote. ‘He offered Matthias any quantity of money, anything to get rid of him. He saw that the disaffection of his wife was a favorable opportunity, and he pressed it, as Matthias told us; he said that Mr. Folger was with him, as Pharaoh with the children of Israel. Anything to get rid of them, and then to pursue them, as in his case. Matthias, in reply to the offer of money, remarked, that if he, Mr. B. Folger, felt as though he had money which belonged to God, he might give it him; and Mr. B. Folger gave Matthias $500 on the day of his departure.’ (Ref: H94)  

When business people of wealth and power start throwing away large amounts of cash, they are usually attempting to achieve what they desire, so what is it that the Folgers require, let’s investigate further and find out, we read quote. ‘Thus we have already related that Mr. B Folger gave Matthias $500 in gold and silver, on the eve of his departure when both he and his wife expressed an unfriendly feeling. This too was deliberately done, and Catherine and Isabella were called as witnesses; Isabella too was paid $25. This gift of money was accompanied with some curious advice, as we before related. Matthias was advised to let Isabella take charge of the gold, assuming that she and Matthias would travel together; and Matthias was further advised, when he arrived at the end of his destination, to put the money in a bedpost.’ (Ref: H107.)            

The idea of Benjamin giving Matthias $500 before his departure is on the surface difficult to comprehend, however as this narrative continues to expand, the historical facts present the reason for it! Unquestionably, this amount of funding will help Matthias keep all his options firmly within his control! He can follow his plan, and move into accommodation within the city of New York: or he can support the Folgers plan, and move into a farmhouse in the wilderness of the west. Whichever strategy Matthias implements requires him to pack his bags and move out of his luxurious accommodation.        

Understandably as Prophet Matthias continues his preparations for departure, all eyes are upon him. Unable or unwilling to change his position, Benjamin continually refuses Matthias’ requests for items from within the house, as quote. ‘The spell was broken, and his day had passed. He was soon silenced, upon being assured that if there was any further trouble with him, Mr. Folger would step to the police-office and get assistance.’ (Ref: C217.) Facing the final threat of police action, we then read that Matthias quote. ‘Obtained a Cartman, sent away his baggage, and departed himself about noon, on the 18th or 19th of September 1834.’

Side Note. In an overview of their current position, we find the Folgers under pressure in the following areas.

  • The courts.
  • The newspapers.
  • Family and friends.
  • Neighbors.
  • The Christian community.

Unceremoniously eventually Matthias departs, after which we read that Ann and Benjamin attempted to find a better place which they could call home. Perhaps it was the fear of Matthias returning that prompted Benjamin and Ann to search for a new home, or maybe it was the need to downsize to reduce expenditure. It could have been the bankruptcy looming on Benjamin’s horizon, or perhaps it was a combination of all these factors along with the need for the Folgers to begin rebuilding their shattered lives! With these kinds of general questions considered, there is yet another version of events that we must investigate. (Ref H101.) This information offers an entirely different reason as to why the Folgers have removed furniture over the past few days. With this information, the dynamics and implications of the Folger situation are better, and more easily understood! Let’s once again return to the newspapers, where we read, quote. ‘Taken back to Mr. Pierson’s home at 8 Third Street.’ Without wishing to turn this investigation into a history book full of dates, business information, and legal jargon, we must now leave this line of inquiry with the general understanding that 8 Third Street has been the communal home of the late Mr. Pierson. (Ref: 254.)      

Correctly the Folgers as friends and business associates were laboring under the illusion that this home was common property within the Zion, which they were attempting to build together! In Chapter twenty, we have learned. ‘It was conveyed to him (Matthias) for ninety-nine years, at the nominal rent of one dollar per annum.’ (Ref 25 & 26.) Undoubtedly Matthias had the legal possession of the property via the agreed documentation; however, on this occasion, the elite members of New York Society, along with the courts, judged and evicted Matthias from Sing Sing, then New York City, by the use of legal, moral, and social enforcement. The removal of Matthias from eight Third Street and the pending departure of the Folgers looks more like squatters vacating the property before the long arm of the law comes a-knocking at the door! Clothed by his wealth, and claimed respectability, once again Mr. M. Pierson, the brother of Elijah, has won this day, and eight Third Street!

THESE FACTS ARE POINT NUMBER 111.

Shockingly, with no home to call her own, Ann is due to give birth to her holy child; the only question is, will this child be the son which Matthias has promised her?       

In time Matthias will find himself reunited with Benjamin and Ann Folger! Bound together by family blood and cash funding, the fanatical spiritual bonds are challenging and almost impossible to escape. After all, Matthias received $500.00, which in 1835 was a small fortune! We have details regarding this funding, which are vital to our storyline. Eventually, events will revolve around this funding, and the coffee served approximately twenty-eight hours before Matthias departed the communal home, we read quote. ‘There is something very curious with this gift of money to Matthias and Isabella, with after circumstances. The money was given partly in silver and partly in gold, and Mr. B. Folger urged that Isabella should take the charge of the gold; but she declined, and, like a great fool, added her money, received as wages, (to that which was) given to Matthias, for the good, we suppose, of the kingdom.’ The $25.00 gift of Isabella’s hard-earned wages to Matthias is an outward expression of her loyalty and support. Interestingly, after the conversation the night before in the kitchen, Sojourner-Truth knows Matthias’ plan; and she is happy to go along with it! In simple terms, Sojourner-truth and Prophet Matthias are working together, united in their endeavors to move forward into a brighter future, leaving the darkness and unwanted attention of what Matthias considers the devils of the gentile world behind them!         

In yet another twist to the intriguing tale, we find the quote. ‘Matthias, however, returned her money before he left the house.’ (Ref H95.) Attempting to make sense of these developments involving Matthias and his plans with Sojourner-Truth, we must remember the principle that knowledge is power.

On several occasions, Benjamin has informed Matthias that he is going to return Matthias’ sons to their mother, Margaret, in Albany. Reluctantly Matthias agreed to this proposed course of action; however, his stated plans are to either find a new home in the west or find and move into a new home in New York. During September of 1834, Prophet Matthias has another plan. Sensibly, he has decided to return to Albany, as the call of Margaret and his family, along with dreams of a better life, is beckoning him.  

Interestingly we are told by Mr. G. Vale quote. ‘At the same time, Mr. and Mrs. Folger were very particular in inquiring where Matthias and Isabella were going, and when, and by what conveyances. But at this time, neither of these persons (Matthias & Sojourner-Truth) could tell, for they had made no definite arrangements.’ At the same time, quote. ‘Catherine secretly advised Isabella not to go with Matthias, and to get back her money for that Matthias would be taken up.’ In response to Catherine’s attempt to help, surprisingly, we are informed quote. ‘Isabella(Sojourner-Truth) had then confidence in Matthias, and knew of no reason why he should be taken up; she, therefore, treated this advice with contempt.’ Surprisingly quote. ‘Matthias and Isabella left on Thursday, 19th September 1834, separately; without stating where they were going.’ (Ref: H107.)      

During their public departure from the Folgers, we find Sojourner-Truth and Matthias united in their agreed course of action; interestingly together, they have a plan which is funded by the Folgers. However, the historical documents make it clear that Matthias and Sojourner-Truth departed eight Third Street at different times.

THESE FACTS ARE POINT NUMBER 112.

Within two days of leaving Third Street, Matthias will have left New York, traveling to Albany, on the first stage of his master plan to find a new place to live in the west, and re-build his Zion with any disciples who believe his doctrines!  Benjamin, on the other hand, after talking with Ann and Catherine and has decided to approach the Police and verbally report his version of events, which potentially places the hangman’s noose around the necks of both Isabella and Matthias!

Important side note for students.  By a stroke of luck or cunning anticipation, Matthias has out-maneuvered Benjamin. He has returned the $25.00 to Isabella after she refused to accept part of the gold and silver directly from Benjamin. Holding all the gold and silver, Matthias is either determined to move forward with the original revised plan to find a farmhouse in the west, or he is entirely on his own, looking for new accommodation in New York, while on the run from the Folgers. Students may, after consideration, conclude this information along with previous historical facts are worthy of a few words while preparing any end of term papers.

In one report, we read the quote. ‘It was very well that Isabella (Sojourner-Truth) did not take charge of this gold. For no sooner was Matthias and Isabella gone than Mr. Folger raised reports, not only of her having poisoned his family but excited suspicion that he had been robbed.’ (Ref: H95.)

With the law enforcement officers on his trail, the charges against Matthias are dangerous, as he, along with Sojourner-Truth, must answer the pending allegations. These charges are stoked and fueled into a newspaper frenzy due to the investigations into the mysterious death of the late Mr. Elijah Pierson.! Additionally, the accusations of stealing gold and silver from the Folgers are forthcoming in the American Advocate dated Wednesday, 8th October 1834, we read quote. ‘The express charge against him was, that he had left New York having in his possession a large amount of Mr. Folger’s property. But he has been guilty, it is asserted of many other mal-practices, some of them of the blackest character, and worthy of the most severe punishment. Death liberated Mr. Pierson, and a subsequent examination of the body, by three able physicians, resulted in the conviction that he had been poisoned. Certificates to this effect were drawn up and signed by these physicians and are now in New York. Who poisoned Mr. Pierson is to be determined by proper tribunal.’ (Ref: 254.)         

 Returning to the departure of Matthias and Sojourner-Truth from the lives of the Folgers it’s important to note the different methods of transport reportedly used by Matthias to complete his journeys because quote. ‘Matthias was in such disfavor with the neighbors that he was not permitted to travel on the Hudson riverboats, but was compelled to make his trips from New York in his carriage.’ Typically, Matthias would travel from New York to Sing-Sing by wagon due to his disfavor with the operators of the riverboats on the Hudson. On this occasion, after he departed from the Folgers, we find Matthias was able to use the steam-boat, which indicates he was on his best behavior, as he purchased the tickets from New York to Albany. With dark clouds of pending troubles looming, Matthias’ quote. ‘Proceeded at once to join his lawful wife (Margaret) in Albany.’ (Ref: 273.)  

Arriving in Albany on Thursday morning, Matthias heads straight for the family home, where he once again comes in contact with his daughter Isabella who has been unwell and in confinement. The term confinement indicates that Isabella is unwell either due to pregnancy or having given birth! In Margaret’s words, we read the quote. ‘While I was at work one day with several others in cleaning the brick meeting house, Isabella came to the door; I was not expecting to see her, for she had not before been out since her confinement; I spoke to the woman next to me I said, there is a lady at the door, who wishes to see someone. She said to me, don’t you know your own daughter; I then recognized her. I observed that she was pale and agitated.          I then suspected that Maria was dead, for I was fearful that she would not live long when I left home. I immediately inquired if it was so, and she said no, but that a greater evil had come upon us. I then asked if Matthias had come, and she said yes and that he appeared to be very pleasant and wished to see me; and that she wished I would come home and see him’. Hearing the surprising news, Margaret is unsure what to do: perhaps she thinks that Matthias wants or needs something from her. In her memoirs, Margaret revealed the following, and I quote. ‘I was very much surprised and in doubt, whether to go or not but those around me advised me to go for the sake of my children, saying that he might have something for them and that if he had as he was my husband and their father it was my duty to receive it. Accordingly, at noon I went, but we said very little to each other; and at one o clock, I returned to my work.’

 Almost in silence, the first reunion meeting is disastrous, and with little or no information exchanged between Matthias and Margaret, we find ourselves transported to the second reunion day when Margaret said quote. ‘On the next day I asked Mr. Matthias what was the cause of his coming to Albany, and he said that he left on account of the election and that Isabella, the colored woman(Sojourner-Truth) would be there with the boys in the afternoon.’ (Ref: MW37.)  From this single sentence, we glean valuable information regarding Matthias and Sojourner-Truth working together. Undoubtedly united, they have met in New York, and they have agreed to meet once again in Albany, at Margaret’s house! This information is essential as it proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is a plan in place, with events not just happening haphazardly!   The circumstantial and factual evidence confirms the idea of Matthias and Sojourner-Truth visiting Albany to return the boys to their mother. Together they plan to depart into the west, in search of a new farmhouse, which they so desperately need for the re-establishment of Matthias’ Zion.      

We know from all the historical documents that Matthias has cash funding, along with gold & silver coins from Benjamin. Additionally, we know that Sojourner-Truth has a minimum of $25.00 given to her for services rendered to the Folgers.

Side note.                                                                                                                                           Sojourner-Truth’s $25.00 in 1834 is equivariant to $750.00 in 2020.                                                   Prophet Matthias’ $500.00 in 1834 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $15,006.69 in 2020, a difference of $14,506.69 over 186 years.

In review, we also have presented the accepted Folger plan to find a new place in the west, which Matthias now views as his plan. Turning to Margaret’s account, we read the following, from her written statement; she said quote. ‘Mr. Matthias came to Albany in consequence of the excitement about Mr. Pierson’s death, and was on his way to the west to obtain a place where Mr. Folger, his wife, and other followers could come to him, and carry on their plans.’ From this first-hand witness statement, the abandoned wife Margaret presents her understanding of the situation. She indicates that Matthias is trying to fulfill the original plan of Benjamin and Ann Folger, as he intends to look for their new home, their new Zion in the west!  With all the circumstantial evidence, the funding, and now with this written statement from Margaret, the purposes of Matthias’ actions are no longer in doubt! Continuing with her narrative, Margaret also then said quote. ‘He came along, and Isabella, the colored woman, (Sojourner-Truth) came after him in another boat. When I asked him why he left Sing-Sing, he said the kingdom was in darkness and must pass into the wilderness, and he must hide himself for forty days.’       

Interestingly we have a small insight into the motivations behind Matthias’ interaction with Margaret his first love, as she said, quote. ‘He called Mrs. Folger, (Ann) his Esther, and me (Margaret) his Vashti. In allusion to which, I asked him what had become of his Esther (Ann), he replied that it had become necessary for them to go into the wilderness for a season.’ (Ref: MW37.)        

The idea of Margaret being Vashti, with Ann being Esther to Matthias, is intriguing as it confirms the belief in Matthias’ mind that Ann is still queen and mother of this fallen house: with Matthias enthroned king and father. Together their child is about to be born, and everything is progressing the way that Ann originally wanted it to progress. She has achieved her goal, as she is in New York with Benjamin: and Matthias is out looking for a new home to re-establish his fallen Zion! The overview of this information is in Appendix three: note two: of Margaret’s statement when she said quote. ‘Soon after, difficulties occurred of a strange character, and it was determined to seek another home. For this purpose, Mr. Folger (Benjamin) gave Matthias the money.’

 In a court of law, the testimony of one witness is good; however, the testimony of several witnesses is more effective, especially if they are all saying the same thing. All the evidence, which unfortunately has been overlooked by most researchers and reporters, confirms the fact that Matthias and Sojourner-Truth are working together attempting to find a new home in the wilderness of the wild west. By exposing additional historical facts in forthcoming chapters, we should, as the saying goes, prepare ourselves for more shocking revelations!

THESE FACTS ARE POINT NUMBER 113.

Side note for American students. In closing this chapter, we should consider the following question. Could it be possible that the American Prophet Matthias is looking for his new home in the west as proposed and funded by Ann and Benjamin Folger; because he wants to re-establish control over Ann, his new house, and new Zion? From the written statements, actions, and circumstantial evidence, the answer is in all probability in the affirmative. However, as we shall soon discover, with Matthias, things never turn out exactly the way they were planned!

It's good to communicate. Your opinions are important. You are invited to make a comment or ask a question.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: